We are neck deep in the current ACA reporting cycle and while the main focus of employers should be meeting their fulfillment and e-filing deadlines, it is important they take note of a clarification recently made by the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS has stated that penalties for noncompliance with the Employer Shared Responsibility Tax have no statute of limitations on when the IRS can impose them. This means that employers are never “safe” or “out of the woods” from receiving penalty letters, even from the very first reporting season, which happened in the spring of 2016. This clarification came from the Chief Counsels Office at the IRS, and the entire memorandum can be read here: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-lafa/20200801f.pdf
On December 2nd the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released Notice 2019-63, which provides three sets of relief for the upcoming Affordable Care Act (ACA) reporting year. This an early Christmas gift for employers and health insurers that are subjec to ACA reporting. Two types of relief are very familiar if you have any experience with ACA reporting. The third type of relief is new to this reporting cycle and only applies to health insurers that are required to provide the B Series forms, so it is somewhat irrelevant to employers in their compliance journey.
At the end of 2018, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was once again thrown into the legal spotlight when a Texas judge ruled that the law was unconstitutional because the individual mandate was essentially no longer in effect.
How often do nonprofits think about the Affordable Care Act (ACA)? The answer is not very often.
This is a problem – especially if you happen to become an applicable large employer (ALE) without even realizing it.
On March 4, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia found the government did not have proper justification to stay the implementation of the EEOC’s expanded Obama-era reporting requirements, which included workforce pay data and hours worked data. Because of this, the court has vacated the 2017 stay and ordered the previous approval of the revised EEO-1 form shall be in effect.
Fifth Circuit Rules Individual Mandate Unconstitutional: However, case gets one step further from the Supreme Court
On Wednesday, December 18th, The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a 2-1 vote that the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional. As a refresher, the individual mandate required U.S. citizens to purchase healthcare coverage or pay a penalty. However, the penalties were zeroed out as part of the 2017 Republican Tax Reform bill. The zeroing out of the penalties is what initially started the legal process that the Fifth Circuit ruled on yesterday.
Affordable Care Act (ACA) compliance is likely the last thing on anyone’s mind during an acquisition.
But that would be a mistake.
Even when everything looks and feels similar after one company purchases another – the same employees, the same company name – that’s not true about their ACA reporting.
Is the Affordable Care Act (ACA) going away, or is it here to stay? This has been an ongoing debate ever since the statute was signed into law.
After a nearly two-month state of uncertainty we now have final word on the 2018 reporting. On April 25, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. ruled that employers are required to submit Component 2 data (i.e. employee wages and hours) for 2018 EEO-1 reporting by Sept. 30.
In September 2016, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced enhanced EEO-1 reporting requirements for all employers subject to completing the EEO-1 form. In addition to the already required job category, ethnicity, and gender data, employers also needed to report on employees’ W-2 wage data and hours worked.